MRI在评估直肠癌局部淋巴结转移中的应用价值

摘要
图/表
参考文献(18)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：分析直肠癌区域淋巴结的MRI影像学表现，评价MRI在评估直肠癌局部淋巴结转移中的应用价值。方法：回顾性分析2015年5—12月经手术治疗并经病理证实的94例直肠癌患者的MRI图像，观察并记录目标淋巴结的短径、边界、信号、ADC值及周围脂肪信号，以病理诊断转移淋巴结阳性为标准进行分组。对转移淋巴结和非转移淋巴结的边界、信号、周围脂肪信号进行卡方检验，短径和ADC值进行t检验。对有统计学意义的诊断指标进行多因素Logistic回归分析，并利用受试者工作特性（ROC）曲线评价诊断价值。结果：转移淋巴结与非转移淋巴结边界、信号及周围脂肪信号有统计学意义（P＜0.05），转移淋巴结和非转移淋巴结的短径分别为（6.25±2.25） mm和（4.80±1.38） mm，两者比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析显示淋巴结短径、边界、信号、周围脂肪信号有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。ROC曲线显示淋巴结边界诊断价值最高，其次为周围脂肪信号、信号和短径，曲线下面积（AUC）分别为0.815、0.798、0.770、0.710。结论：综合分析直肠周围淋巴结短径、边界、信号特点及周围脂肪信号对诊断转移淋巴结有较大作用，其中边缘、周围脂肪信号的作用最为显著，信号、短径也有助于提高诊断。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	戴鑫
	徐青
	余静
	李燕
	施海彬

关键词 ：直肠肿瘤, 肿瘤转移, 磁共振成像

Abstract：Objective: To evaluate the application of MRI in the diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Methods: During the period from May to December 2015, 94 patients with pathologically-proved rectal underwent MRI were included. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The short-axis diameter, margin, signal and ADC values of the target node and the signal of perirectal fat were observed and recorded. Patients were assigned to the malignant node or benign node group according to pathological analysis. Chi-square(χ2) trend test was used to test the margin, signal and the signal of perirectal fat of metastasizing lymph nodes and nonmetastasizing lymph nodes, short-axis diameter and ADC values were compared using the t-test. Multivariate analysis to determine independent significant individual variables by multiple Logistic regression analysis. ROC curve analysis was done to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency. Results: The margin, signal of lymph nodes and signal of perrectal fat showed correlation with the lymph node metastasis(P＜0.05). The short-axis diameter of metastatic nodes and non-metastatic nodes was (6.25±2.25) mm and(4.80±1.38) mm respectively, the differences between the two groups were significant(P＜0.05). The short-axis diameter, margin, signal and the signal of perirectal fat were proved to be significant independent predictors of lymph node metastasis by Logistic regression analysis. The AUC value showed that margin carried the highest credibility for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis, and the next were the signal of perirectal fat and signal. Conclusion: It was helpful to improve the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis by considering the short-axis diameter, margin and signal of the lymph nodes and the signal of perirectal fat, especially the margin and the signal of perirectal fat.

Key words： Rectal neoplasms Neoplasm metastasis Magnetic resonance imaging

收稿日期: 2016-05-19

PACS:
	Ｒ735.37
	Ｒ73-37
	Ｒ445.2

通讯作者: 徐青，南京医科大学第一附属医院江苏省人民医院放射科，210029。E-mail：13776683209@163.com

作者简介: 戴鑫（１９92－），男，江苏泰州人，在读硕士研究生。E-mail：dx15950531913@sina.cn

引用本文:

戴鑫，徐青，余静，李燕，施海彬. MRI在评估直肠癌局部淋巴结转移中的应用价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2017, 28(2): 112-115.
DAI Xin, XU Qing, YU Jing, LI Yan, SHI Hai-bin. The application value of MRI in the diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2017, 28(2): 112-115.

链接本文:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V28/I2/112

[1]Samee A, Selvasekar CR. Current trends in staging rectal cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2011, 17(7): 828-834.
[2]陈慰慰，李增军，徐忠法. 直肠癌新辅助治疗的进展[J]. 中国医药导报，2013，10（15）：40-42.
[3]Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Nelemans PJ, et al. Imaging for predicting the risk factors-the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a Meta-analysis[J]. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 2005, 26(4): 259-268.
[4]李亮，韩悦，白玫，等. MRI对直肠癌术前诊断的价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志，2012，28（5）：706-709.
[5]容蓉，孙晓伟，王霄英，等. MRI和CT对原发直肠癌术前N分期的诊断研究[J]. 实用放射学杂志，2011，27（10）：1495-1498.
[6]Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison[J]. Radiology, 2003, 227(2): 371-377.
[7]刘影，张茜. 高分辨率MRI、DWI序列对直肠癌术前TN分期的价值[J]. 中国临床保健杂志，2014，17（5）：498-501.
[8]Kim JH, Beets GL, Kim MJ, et al. High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size?[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2004, 52(1): 78-83.
[9]Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(7): 2212-2223.
[10]张浩波，张欢，陆兴生，等. MRI在直肠癌术前分期中的作用[J]. 外科理论与实践，2010，15（6）：647-650.
[11]Ogawa S, Hida J, Ike H, et al. Selection of Lymph Node-Positive Cases Based on Perirectal and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Study of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(4): 1187-1194.
[12]Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL. Local staging of rectal cancer: a review of imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2011, 33(5): 1012-1019.
[13]Akasu T, Iinuma G, Takawa M, et al. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2009, 16(10): 2787-2794.
[14]Koh DM, Brown G, Husband JE. Nodal staging in rectal cancer[J]. Abdom Imaging, 2006, 31(6): 652-659.
[15]张森，康钰，杜湘珂. 扩散加权成像评估结直肠癌区域淋巴结转移预后相关因素分析[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志，2015，23（7）：513-516.
[16]亓俊霞，白人驹，张翔，等. 薄层MRI联合MR扩散加权成像对直肠癌术前局部分期的价值[J]. 临床放射学杂志，2011，30（12）：1783-1787.
[17]马二奎，梁宇霆，郑晓丹. MR扩散加权成像对结直肠癌区域淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 国际医学放射学杂志，2013，36（5）：418-421.
[18]Heijnen LA, Lambregts DM, Mondal D, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in primary rectal cancer staging demonstrates but does not characterise lymph nodes[J]. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(12): 3354-3360.