Abstract:Objective: To investigate the clinical value of ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system(BI-RADS) in diagnosis of breast small carcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed ultrasound features, BI-RADS classification and pathological results of 255 small breast lesions which were diagnosed as 3~5 staged ultrasound BI-RADS. Results: The pathological results suggested that among 255 small breast lesions there are 191 benign lesions and 64 malignant lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value(PPV) and negative predictive value(NPV) of ultrasound BI-RADS classification were 89.06%, 80.63%, 82.75%, 60.64% and 95.65%, respectively. The differences in non-circumscribed margin, irregular shape, aspect ratio>1, microcalcification in mass, lesions internal resistance index(RI)≥0.7, shadowing and the changes of surrounding tissue between benign and malignant lesions were statistically significant(P<0.05). Higher sensitivity was found in non-circumscribed margin(82.81%) and irregular shape(85.94%). Higher specificity was found in aspect ratio>1(89.53%), microcalcification in mass(90.05%), lesions internal RI≥0.7(92.67%), shadowing(95.29%) and the changes of surrounding tissue(99.48%). Conclusion: Ultrasound BI-RADS is of great value in diagnosing the benign and malignant breast masses and contributed to early detection, diagnosis, treatment of breast tiny carcinoma.
杨莹莹,黄健源,黄美枝,利锡贵,莫 丽. 超声BI-RADS分类在微小乳腺癌诊断中的临床价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2017, 28(11): 789-792.
YANG Ying-ying, HUANG Jian-yuan, HUANG Mei-zhi, LI Xi-gui, MO Li. The clinical value of ultrasound BI-RADS in diagnosis of breast tiny carcinoma. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2017, 28(11): 789-792.
[1]冯新熠,陆苏,刘红. 亚洲国家及地区乳腺癌筛查指南的发展和实践[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2015,42(8):451-454.
[2]中华人民共和国卫生医政司. 中国常见恶性肿瘤诊治规范(第八分册)[M]. 2版. 北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1992:58.
[3]翁剑华,钟鸣,黄卓雅,等. 乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移危险因素的研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志,2016,10(6):490-492.
[4]Chen M, Zhan WW, Wang WP. Cystic breast lesions by conventional ultrasonography: sonographic subtype-pathologic correlation and BI-RADS assessment[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2014, 10(1): 76-83.
[5]Arleo EK, Saleh M, Ionescu D, et al. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning(ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience[J]. Clin Imaging, 2014, 38(4): 439-444.
[6]American College of Radiology(ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)[M]. 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2013.
[7]Hsu HH, Yu JC, Lee HS, et al. Complex cystic lesions of the breast on ultrasonography: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011, 79(1): 73-79.
[8]Cheng HD, Cai XP, Chen XW, et al. Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2003, 36(12): 2967-2991.
[9]刘金萍,贵玉,马棣,等. 微小乳腺癌的超声恶性征象研究[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(13):1338-1341.
[10]王双辉,杨振江,杨东炜,等. 超声BI-RADS 3、4、5级对乳腺肿瘤临床诊断的意义[J]. 中国现代医生,2014,52(5):144-147.
[11]卢建明,赵淑红,田锦,等. 乳腺超声检查中BI-RADS分级诊断标准对乳腺肿瘤的诊断价值[J]. 宁夏医学杂志,2015,37(2):140-142.
[12]张志斌,吴晓恬. 超声BI-RADS分级标准在乳腺病变检查中的应用[J]. 分子影像学杂志,2015,38(4):316-318.