自适应迭代重建算法在低对比剂肾动脉CTA扫描中的应用

doi:10.12117/jccmi.2018.10.008

摘要
图/表
参考文献(14)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：探索自适应迭代重建算法（ASIR）在降低肾动脉CTA对比剂用量的应用价值。方法：对40例行肾动脉CTA的患者随机分成两组：常规组（A组）20例，对比剂用量为600 mgI/kg；低对比剂用量组（B组）20例，对比剂用量为300 mgI/kg。采用GSI扫描模式，智能mA，噪声指数为10 HU，螺距为1.375∶1，转速为0.6 s/r，40 s时采集动脉期图像。对所得数据进行重建，常规组用40％ASIR 70 keV进行图像重建，低对比剂用量组用40％ASIR 40～70 keV间隔5 keV进行图像重建（40、45、50、55、60、65、70 keV）。测量每组图像的平扫和动脉期肾动脉的CT值（CT1，CT2）和标准差（SD1，SD2），动脉期图像的竖脊肌的CT值（CT3）和标准差（SD3）。计算每组图像肾动脉的强化幅度（ΔCT=CT2-CT1），信噪比SNR=CT2/SD2，对比噪声比CNR=（CT2-CT3）/SD3，对以上数据进行单因素方差分析。两名经验丰富的医生使用5分系统对每组图像进行盲法主观评分，评分的一致性采用Kappa检验，组间主观评分采用Wilcoxon检验。结果：600 mgI/kg 70 keV组和300 mgI/kg 45 keV组的主观评分医生1和医生2分别是3.90±0.55和4.00±0.65，3.55±0.83和3.70±0.80，其差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），客观参数ΔCT、SNR值和CNR差异亦无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：当对比剂的用量降低50%时，ASIR在肾动脉CTA中可以获得满足诊断的图像质量。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	郭长义1
	韩冬2
	杨创勃2
	雷雨欣2
	贺太平2
	张喜荣3

关键词 ：肾动脉, 体层摄影术, X线计算机

Abstract：Objective: To evaluate the application value of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction(ASIR) in reducing the dosage of CTA contrast agent in renal artery. Methods: Forty patients with renal artery CTA were randomly divided into two groups: routine group 20 cases(group A) with 600 mgI/kg and low contrast medium dose group 20 cases(group B) with 300 mgI/kg. The scan protocol was: Discovery CT750HD, smart mA, noise index of 10 HU, pitch 1.375:1, rotating speed 0.6 s/r. Images of the artery phase were reconstructed at 0.625 mm thickness with 40%ASIR, group A reconstructed monochromatic images at 70 keV, group B reconstructed monochromatic images from 40～70 keV by interval 5 keV. The CT values and standard deviation(SD) values of the renal artery in plain scan(CT1, SD1) and the arterial phase(CT2, SD2), and the erector muscle of spine in the arterial phase(CT3, SD3) were measured. The enhancement degree of the renal artery(ΔCT=CT2-CT1), the signal to noise ratio(SNR=CT2/SD2) and contrast to noise ratio(CNR=(CT2-CT3)/SD3) were calculated. Single factor analysis of variance was used. The subjective image scores of the groups were assessed blindly by two experienced physicians using a 5-point system and the score consistency was compared by the Kappa test. Results: The subjective scores of the 600 mgI/kg 70 keV group and the 300 mgI/kg 45 keV group were 3.90±0.55 and 4.00±0.65, 3.55±0.83 and 3.70±0.80, and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05), and there was no significant difference in the objective parameters(ΔCT, SNR and CNR)(P>0.05). Conclusion: When the dosage of contrast medium is reduced by 50%, the ASIR can get the image quality satisfying the diagnosis in the renal artery CTA.

Key words： Renal artery Tomography, X-ray computed

收稿日期: 2017-11-14

PACS:	Ｒ692.16
	Ｒ814.42

通讯作者: 张喜荣，陕西中医药大学医学技术学院，712000。E-mail：113124329@qq.com

作者简介: 郭长义（1983-），男，河南商丘人，主治医师。E-mail：344952556@qq.com

引用本文:

郭长义1，韩冬2，杨创勃2，雷雨欣2，贺太平2，张喜荣3. 自适应迭代重建算法在低对比剂肾动脉CTA扫描中的应用[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2018, 29(10): 713-716.
GUO Chang-yi1, HAN Dong2, YANG Chuang-bo2, LEI Yu-xin2, HE Tai-ping2, ZHANG Xi-rong3. Application of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in renal CTA with low-dose contrast medium. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 29(10): 713-716.

链接本文:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/10.12117/jccmi.2018.10.008 或 http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/Y2018/V29/I10/713

[1]Rubin GD, Leipsic J, Joseph SU, et al. CT angiography after 20 years: a transformation in cardiovascular disease characterization continues to advance[J]. Radiology, 2014, 271(3): 633-652.
[2]Li K, Garrett J, Ge Y, et al. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction(MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part Ⅱ. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance[J]. Med Phys, 2014, 41(7): 071911.
[3]赵永霞，常津，左紫薇，等. 不同浓度对比剂联合能谱CT扫描在肾动脉CT血管成像中的应用[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志，2016，24（2）：153-156.
[4]Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Hahn PF, et al. 16-MDCT angiography in living kidney donors at various tube potentials: impact on image quality and radiation dose[J]. AJR, 2007, 188(1): 115-120.
[5]McCullough PA. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 51(15): 1419-1428.
[6]Liang M, Yang S, Fu N. Efficacy of short-term moderate or high-dose rosuvastatin in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy: A meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2017, 96(27): e7384.
[7]曹东兴，程涛，贾鑫鑫，等. 双低能谱CT对活体供肾动脉的术前评估[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志，2015，23（7）：527-530.
[8]叶伦，叶奕兰，冉艮龙，等. 宝石能谱CT的成像原理及临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志：电子版，2013，7（19）：8919-8921.
[9]杨晶，高艳，李坤成，等. FBP、ASiR和VEO重建算法对腹部CT图像质量的影响[J]. 放射学实践，2013，28（8）：893-897.
[10]Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques[J]. Radiology, 2010, 257(2): 373-383.
[11]Kahn J, Grupp U, Rotzinger R, et al. CT for evaluation of potential renal donors—how does iterative reconstruction influence image quality and dose[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2014, 83(8): 1332-1336.
[12]成巧梅，吴青霞，孙亚平，等. 宝石能谱CT在降低肾动脉成像对比剂浓度和用量中的应用研究[J]. 临床放射学杂志，2013，32（8）：1176-1179.
[13]Paruccini N, Villa R, Pasquali C, et al. Evaluation of a commercial Model Based Iterative reconstruction algorithm in computed tomography[J]. Phys Med, 2017, 41: 58-70.
[14]Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study[J]. AJR, 2009, 193(3): 764-771.