不同场强下磁共振IDEAL-IQ技术对腰椎椎体脂肪含量定量对比分析

doi:10.12117/jccmi.2019.09.012

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：探讨1.5T和3.0T MRI上非对称回波最小二乘估算法迭代水脂分离序列（Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation quantitation sequence，IDEAL-IQ）技术对腰椎椎体脂肪含量（Fat fraction，FF）定量评估的差异。材料和方法：在提供知情同意后，对21名健康志愿者在4~6 h内分别进行了腰椎1.5T和3.0T MRI的常规序列以及IDEAL-IQ序列检查，志愿者年龄21～50岁，平均（27.95±9.92）岁。在GE AW4.6工作站上分别测量不同场强下L1～L5椎体FF值，并对两组进行配对t检验分析。结果：1.5T和3.0T MRI IDEAL-IQ序列定量测量腰椎各椎体FF值不存在统计学差异，配对样本t检验分析显示，1.5T & 3.0T L1椎体（t=1.58，P=0.13），1.5T & 3.0T L2椎体（t=-1.11，P=0.28），1.5T & 3.0T L3椎体（t=0.77，P=0.45），1.5T & 3.0T L4椎体（t=0.67，P=0.51），1.5T & 3.0T L5椎体（t=0.18，P=0.86）。结论：磁共振IDEAL-IQ技术可以定量测量腰椎椎体FF值，其测量值在1.5T和3.0T场强下无差别。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	宋宇
	宋清伟
	张楠
	刘爱连
	苗延巍

关键词 ：腰椎, 骨髓疾病, 磁共振成像

Abstract：Objective: To explore the difference of proton density fat fraction(PDFF) values measured by lumbar vertebra magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) under different field strengths of 1.5T and 3.0T. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board. After signing informed consent, 21 healthy volunteers were scanned within 4～6 h under 1.5T and 3.0T MRI scanners, respectively. Both conventional lumbar MRI sequences and iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation quantitation sequence(IDEAL-IQ) were tested to provide lumbar vertebra PDFF. The volunteers ranged in age from 21 to 50, with an average age of 27.95±9.92. L1~L5 lumbar vertebral sites were analyzed using IDEAL-IQ sequence, and the fat fraction(FF) values of two groups obtained from 1.5T and 3.0T GE MR scanners were compared with each other. The FF values of vertebral bone marrows were measured on AW4.6 postprocessing workstation. Paired t-test analysis between the two groups was performed. Results: The difference of the FF values was not statistically significant. Paired sample t-test analysis showed 1.5T & 3.0T L1 vertebral body(t=1.58, P=0.13), 1.5T & 3.0T L2 vertebral body(t=-1.11, P=0.28), 1.5T & 3.0T L3 vertebral body(t=0.77, P=0.45), 1.5T & 3.0T L4 vertebral body(t=0.67, P=0.51), 1.5T & 3.0 L5 vertebral body(t=0.18, P=0.86). Conclusion: Using IDEAL-IQ sequence to estimate the lumbar vertebra fat fraction is feasible. It can provide reliable marrow fat quantification.

Key words： Lumbar vertebrae Bone marrow diseases Magnetic resonance imaging

收稿日期: 2018-10-08

PACS:	Ｒ551.3
	Ｒ445.2

基金资助:首都科技领军人才培养工程资助（Z181100006318003）。

通讯作者: 宋清伟，大连医科大学附属第一医院放射科，116011。E-mail：songqw1964@163.com

作者简介: 宋宇（1995-），女，四川成都人，在读硕士研究生。E-mail：babysong020@163.com

引用本文:

宋宇，宋清伟，张楠，刘爱连，苗延巍. 不同场强下磁共振IDEAL-IQ技术对腰椎椎体脂肪含量定量对比分析[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2019, 30(9): 656-659.
SONG Yu, SONG Qing-wei, ZHANG Nan, LIU Ai-lian, MIAO Yan-wei. Quantitative comparison and analysis of lumbar vertebral fat content by IDEAL-IQ under different field intensities. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 30(9): 656-659.

链接本文:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/10.12117/jccmi.2019.09.012 或 http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V30/I9/656

[1]Geith T, Schmidt G, Biffar A, et al. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and chemical-shift imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral body fractures[J]. AJR, 2012, 199(5): 1083-1092.
[2]Bermeo S, Gunaratnam K, Duque G. Fat and bone interactions[J]. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2014, 12(2): 235-242.
[3]Serai SD, Dillman JR, Trout AT. Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements at 1.5- and 3-T Hepatic MR Imaging: Same-Day Agreement among Readers and across Two Imager Manufacturers[J]. Radiology, 2017, 284(1): 244-254.
[4]常飞霞，樊敦徽，和建伟，等. 磁共振化学位移成像评估腰椎终板炎患者骨髓脂肪含量的研究[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志，2018，16（2）：114-117.
[5]何杰，方浩，李晓娜，等. 腰椎MR扩散加权成像对骨质疏松的定量诊断价值[J]. 临床放射学杂志，2015，34（5）：763-767.
[6]Xu K, Sigurdsson S, Gudnason V, et al. Reliable quantification of marrow fat content and unsaturation level using in vivo MR spectroscopy[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2018, 79(3): 1722-1729.
[7]常飞霞，黄刚，樊敦徽，等. 磁共振水-脂分离成像技术对椎体脂肪含量的测量[J]. 磁共振成像，2016，7（12）：902-908.
[8]Hu L, Zha YF, Wang L, et al. Quantitative Evaluation of Vertebral Microvascular Permeability and Fat Fraction in Alloxan-induced Diabetic Rabbits[J]. Radiology, 2018, 287(1): 128-136.
[9]Aoki T, Yamaguchi S, Kinoshita S, et al. Quantification of bone marrow fat content using iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation(IDEAL): reproducibility, site variation and correlation with age and menopause[J]. Br J Radiol, 2016, 89(1065): 20150538.
[10]代岳，王姗，徐慧婷，等. IDEAL-IQ技术对不同年龄椎体骨髓脂肪含量的定量评价[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志，2017，23（2）：161-165.
[11]Roldan-Valadez E, Pina-Jimenez C, Favila R, et al. Gender and age groups interactions in the quantification of bone marrow fat content in lumbar spine using 3T MR spectroscopy: a multivariate analysis of covariance(Mancova)[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(11): e697-702.
[12]Martin J, Nicholson G, Cowin G, et al. Rapid determination of vertebral fat fraction over a large range of vertebral bodies[J]. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2014, 58(2): 155-163.
[13]Heba ER, Desai A, Zand KA, et al. Accuracy and the effect of possible subject-based confounders of magnitude-based MRI for estimating hepatic proton density fat fraction in adults, using MR spectroscopy as reference[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 43(2): 398-406.
[14]Ruschke S, Pokorney A, Baum T, et al. Measurement of vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in children using quantitative water-fat MRI[J]. MAGMA, 2017, 30(5): 449-460.