应用全模型迭代重建技术的低剂量冠脉CTA在疑似冠心病患者中诊断价值的初步研究

doi:DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2020.04.006

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：评估应用全模型迭代重建（IMR）技术的低剂量冠脉CTA显示冠状动脉的图像质量及其对疑似冠心病患者冠脉狭窄的诊断价值。方法：回顾分析我院疑似冠心病并接受冠脉CTA及冠状动脉造影（CAG）检查的患者80例。采用4分法对冠脉各主支进行主观质量评分。以CAG显示冠脉管腔直径缩小超过50%为阳性标准，分别在冠脉节段、主支水平分析冠脉CTA诊断冠脉狭窄的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值（PPV）、阴性预测值（NPV）及准确度，将患者按Agaston积分分成两组（A组＜400，B组≥400），比较两组间诊断效能的差异。结果：在节段水平上，98.1%的冠脉图像质量合格，冠脉CTA诊断冠脉狭窄的灵敏度、特异度、PPV、NPV及准确度分别为93.2%、98.0%、91.3%、98.4%、97.1%；在主支水平上，96.6%的冠脉图像质量合格，冠脉CTA诊断冠脉狭窄的灵敏度、特异度、PPV、NPV及准确度分别为84.6%、93.0%、88.9%、90.1%、89.6%；A、B两组之间在特异度、PPV和准确度上存在显著差异（99.2％ & 91.8％，95.7％ & 84.2％，97.9％ & 93.7％，P<0.05）。结论：应用IMR技术的低剂量冠脉CTA检查可获得满意的图像质量，对冠脉狭窄具有较高的诊断准确性，但对严重钙化的血管节段的诊断尚有局限性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘鑫
	杨林林
	王一婧
	高思喆
	马跃
	侯阳

关键词 ：冠状动脉疾病, 体层摄影术, 螺旋计算机, 血管造影术

Abstract：Objective: To evaluate the image quality of low-dose coronary CTA combined with iterative model reconstruction(IMR) in coronary arteries and its diagnostic value for coronary stenosis in patients with suspected coronary heart disease. Methods: Eighty patients with suspected coronary heart disease who underwent coronary CTA and the catheter coronary angiography(CAG) in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The image quality of each coronary artery was divided into 4 grades. Coronary angiography showing coronary artery luminal diameter reduction>50% as positive standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value(PPV), negative predictive value(NPV) and accuracy of coronary CTA in the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis were analyzed at the level of coronary artery segment and main artery. Patients were divided into two groups according to the Agaston score(group A <400, group B≥400). The difference in diagnostic efficacy between the two groups was compared. Results: At the segment level, 98.1% of the coronary images were qualified, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of CTA were 93.2%, 98.0%, 91.3%, 98.4% and 97.1% respectively. At the level of main artery, 96.6% of coronary images were qualified, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of CTA were 84.6%, 93.0%, 88.9%, 90.1% and 89.6%, respectively. There were significant differences in specificity, PPV and accuracy between groups A and B(99.2% & 91.8%, 95.7% & 84.2%, 97.9% & 93.7%, P<0.05). Conclusions: Low-dose coronary CTA combined with IMR can obtain satisfactory image quality and has high diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery stenosis. However, the diagnosis of severely calcified segments is still limited.

Key words： Coronary disease Tomography, spiral computed Angiography

收稿日期: 2019-07-18

PACS:	Ｒ543.3
	Ｒ814.42
	Ｒ814.43

通讯作者: 侯阳，中国医科大学附属盛京医院放射科，110004。E-mail：houyang1973@163.com

作者简介: 刘鑫（1991-），女，辽宁本溪人，医师。E-mail：359729602@qq.com。

引用本文:

刘鑫，杨林林，王一婧，高思喆，马跃，侯阳. 应用全模型迭代重建技术的低剂量冠脉CTA在疑似冠心病患者中诊断价值的初步研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2020, 31(4): 252-257.
LIU Xin, YANG Lin-lin, WANG Yi-jing, GAO Si-zhe, MA Yue, HOU Yang. A preliminary study on the diagnostic value of iterative model reconstruction technique combined with low-dose coronary CTA in patients with suspected coronary heart disease. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 31(4): 252-257.

链接本文:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2020.04.006 或 http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V31/I4/252

[1]Rani S, Lakshmi R, Pillai AAK, et al. The risk factors associated with complications of coronary angiogram: A cross-sectional observational study[J]. Int J Adv Med Health Res, 2016, 3(1): 11-15. [2]Azzalini L, Candilio L, Mccullough PA, et al. Current Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Reappraisal of the Literature[J]. Can J Cardiol, 2017, 33(10): 1225-1228. [3]Joshi H, Shah R, Prajapati J, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography Angiography as Compared to Conventional Angiography in Patients Undergoing Noncoronary Cardiac Surgery[J]. Heart Views, 2016, 17(3): 88-91. [4]Wang SY, Gao W, Zhong YM, et al. Prospective ECG-triggering cardiac CT for infants with complex congenital heart disease using low-dose contrast medium, low tube voltage, and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction[J]. Clin Radiol, 2017, 72(6): 502-507. [5]Bu G, Miao Y, Bin J, et al. Comparison of 128-Slice Low-Dose Prospective ECG-Gated CT Scanning and Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography for the Diagnosis of Complex Congenital Heart Disease[J]. PloS One, 2016, 11(10): e0165617. [6]Goodenberger MH, Wagner-Bartak NA, Gupta S, et al. Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen(Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2018, 42(2): 184-190. [7]Funama Y, Utsunomiya D, Hirata K, et al. Improved Estimation of Coronary Plaque and Luminal Attenuation Using a Vendor-specific Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in Contrast-enhanced CT Coronary Angiography[J]. Acad Radiol, 2017, 24(9): 1070-1078. [8]André F, Fortner P, Vembar M, et al. Improved image quality with simultaneously reduced radiation exposure: Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithms for coronary CT angiography in a clinical setting[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2017, 11(3): 213-220. [9]Károlyi M, Szilveszter B, Kolossváry M, et al. Iterative model reconstruction reduces calcified plaque volume in coronary CT angiography[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2017, 87: 83-89. [10]Cha MJ, Seo JS, Yoo DS, et al. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection[J]. Acta Radiol, 2018, 59(3): 280-286. [11]Ippolito D, Riva L, Franzesi CRT, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm in an assessment of coronary artery in comparison with standard hybrid-Iterative reconstruction algorithm: dose reduction and image quality[J]. Radiol Med, 2018, 124(5): 350-359. [12]Den Harder AM, Willemink MJ, van Doormaal PJ, et al. Radiation dose reduction for CT assessment of urolithiasis using iterative reconstruction: A prospective intra-individual study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(1): 143-150. [13]Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, et al. Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection[J]. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(10): 2130-2138. [14]Hou Y, Ma Y, Fan W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease[J]. Eur Radiol, 2014, 24(1): 3-11. [15]Meinel FG, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, et al. First-arterial-pass dual-energy CT for assessment of myocardial blood supply: do we need rest, stress, and delayed acquisition? Comparison with SPECT[J]. Radiology, 2014, 270(3): 708-716. [16]Hou Y, Xu S, Guo W, et al. The optimal dose reduction level using iterative reconstruction with prospective ECG-triggered coronary CTA using 256-slice MDCT[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(12): 3905-3911. [17]赵正凯，程绍玲，赖声远，等. 体重指数正常患者80 kVp低剂量冠状动脉CTA成像联合全模型迭代重建与iDose4、FBP重建算法图像质量的对照[J]. 中国老年学杂志，2019，39（1）：119-123. [18]Khawaja RD, Singh S, Blake M, et al. Ultra-low dose abdominal MDCT: using a knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction technique for substantial dose reduction in a prospective clinical study[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2015, 84(1): 2-10. [19]Hansen NJ, Kaza RK, Maturen KE, et al. Evaluation of low-dose CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction after endovascular aneurysm repair of a thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. AJR, 2014, 202(3): 648-655. [20]Zhang LJ, Wang Y, Schoepf UJ, et al. Image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp in a clinical setting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(3): 797-806. [21]Liang J, Wang H, Xu L, et al. Diagnostic performance of 256-row detector coronary CT angiography in patients with high heart rates within a single cardiac cycle: a preliminary study[J]. Clin Radiol, 2017, 72(8): 694.e7-694.e14. [22]肖冲冲，黄贤胜，丁振江，等. 64排螺旋CT冠状动脉成像对冠心病诊断准确性的影响因素分析[J]. 临床心血管病杂志，2016，32（3）：245-250. [23]范依莎，侯阳，赵鹏飞，等. 低剂量前置门控冠脉CTA结合迭代重建技术在不典型胸痛患者中的应用研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志，2013，24（3）：169-173. [24]Sato S, Horii Y, Yoshimura N, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography using 128-slice dual-source computed tomography in patients with severe calcification[J]. Jap J Radiol, 2017, 35(8): 432-439. [25]Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Kilovolt Peak-Switching Dual-Energy CT Coronary Angiography in Patients With a High Calcium Score[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015, 8(6): 746-748. [26]Schindler A, Vliegenthart R, Schoepf UJ, et al. Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo[J]. Radiology, 2014, 270(2): 387-393. [27]Yu M, Li Y, Li W, et al. Calcification remodeling index assessed by cardiac CT predicts severe coronary stenosis in lesions with moderate to severe calcification[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2017, 12(1): 42-49. [28]Szilveszter B, Elzomor H, Károlyi M, et al. The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 32(1): 153-160.